BBC’s Kashmir coverage not as ‘impartial’ as claimed

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) scored over all other media outlets covering Kashmir in the wake of unprecedented clamp down of the valley after parliament approved the revocation of Article 370 on August 5.

Share
Written by
Wednesday, September 4, 2019 - 11:47
BBC KASHMIR

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) scored over all other media outlets covering Kashmir in the wake of unprecedented clamp down of the valley after parliament approved the revocation of Article 370 on August 5. While national media miserably failed to rise up to the occasion owing to a variety of reasons including nationalistic zeal of majority of journalists/owners of media houses, international media organisations filled the void. BBC, Aljazeera, Reuters, Associated Press, New York Time, etc. managed to find their way to report from the territory under siege. Among them BBC emerged as the star performer.

Its video of August 9 protest in Srinagar became a talking point. But the central government as well as the troll army of Hindutva forces were quick to reject the video as “fabricated and incorrect”. The British public broadcaster was ridiculed by the nationalists in the country for broadcasting “fake news”. It became a fodder for the likes of Aranb Goswami in the mainstream media who saw in it a colonial conspiracy against India. But BBC stood its ground and issued a statement refuting government and its supporters’ claim of ‘misrepresenting’ the events in Kashmir. The statement read: “The BBC stands by its journalism and we strongly refute any claims that we have misrepresented events in Kashmir. We are covering the situation impartially and accurately.

Like other broadcasters we are currently operating under severe restrictions in Kashmir but we will continue to report what is happening.” Though the government continued to deny that any large-scale protests took place in Srinagar’s Soura area on August 9 and even sought from BBC and Al Jazeera the raw footage of their photos and videos, three days later the Union Home Ministry was forced to acknowledge that a protest actually took place. A spokesperson of the ministry wrote on Twitter on August 13 that “miscreants mingled with people returning home after prayers at a local mosque” in Srinagar’s Soura, leading to violence but not resulting in the firing of bullets. But despite this commendable job, can we trust BBC? Its bold coverage of today’s Kashmir and pledge to do journalism in adverse conditions notwithstanding, the British broadcaster is not as ‘impartial’ as it claims. A comparison of its coverage of ongoing events in Kashmir by the Hindi and Urdu services of BBC bares the fact.

It seems BBC has adopted two sets of editorial policy for India and Pakistan so much so that at times they are found to be at variance with one another. BBC Hindi Service, with an eye on Indian audience, launched in 2017 a half-an-hour Television programme called Duniya. The programme is produced and broadcast from New Delhi for which BBC has rented a slot on India TV news channel. Similarly, for its Urdu viewers in Pakistan, it relays its popular radio programme Sairbeen in video version as well. The kind of reporting done on Duniya and Sairbeen are so different that at times it gives the impression of channels of India and Pakistan and not a third and neutral country.

A press conference held in Delhi on August 14 is a case in point. Noted economist Jean Dreze, activists Kavitha Krishnan, Maimoona Mollah and Vimalbhai addressed the press conference wherein they gave details of their visit to Kashmir after its special status was withdrawn by the Centre and its control was handed over to security forces. The press conference drew unusual interest among national and international media as it was the first ever narration of the situation in Kashmir by some concerned citizens who had risked their lives and reputation by touring the valley for five days. Each word said by them made news.

They had also shot a documentary which the Press Club authorities did not allow to be screened. Hindi’s Duniya mostly focused on Maimoona Mollah who narrated how she and her team members were prevented from going to hospitals where victims of alleged firing by security forces were admitted. She also informed about Press Club authorities telling them the kind of pressure they were facing because of the press conference. She said they (the activists) were informally told not to screen the documentary they had brought from Kashmir. Duniya also showed Jean Dreze telling his audience about the restrictions his team experienced in Kashmir.

It confirmed the reports of Reuters, New York Times, etc., he said. But BBC’s Hindi channel blacked out Kavita Krishnan, a leader of Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist). Owing to her candid talk and verbal attacks on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, she is one the most hated figures in the official circles. She was shown sitting along with others in the press conference but the focus shifted on others. In contrast, Urdu’s Sairbeen focused only on the statement that Krishnan made at the press conference. “We had heard that more than 100 people have been deta

Click on the ad to support Pal Pal News